Contradiction with Matthew 28:19
This verse commands the disciples to teach all nations, which contrasts with the idea that God's statutes were only given to Israel as stated in Psalms 147:20.
Matthew 28:19: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: [teach...: or, make disciples, or, Christians of all nations]
Contradiction with Romans 2:14
This verse explains that Gentiles, who do not have the law, naturally do the things contained in the law, suggesting that God's laws are not exclusive to Israel, in contradiction with Psalms 147:20.
Romans 2:14: For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
Peter acknowledges that God shows no partiality and accepts those from every nation who fear Him and do what is right, which implies inclusivity beyond Israel as opposed to Psalms 147:20.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse speaks of unity across ethnic and social lines in Christ, indicating that distinctions such as being Jews who received the law are no longer relevant, challenging the exclusivity suggested in Psalms 147:20.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
The verse highlights God's special relationship with a specific group of people, which might seem inconsistent with the belief that God treats all people equally. Some might see a conflict between this and the idea of a universally loving and just God, as it could be interpreted as showing favoritism.
Paradox #2
This verse might raise questions about inclusivity and favoritism. Some people might see it as highlighting a special relationship between God and a specific group of people, which could be viewed as conflicting with the idea of equality among all humans. This perception could lead to discussions about whether or not certain groups were favored over others in historical contexts related to religious teachings.
Paradox #3
Psalms 147:20 speaks about God giving laws and decrees to one nation and not to others. The potential contradiction here is the idea of fairness. Some people might find it unfair or inconsistent for God to favor one group over others by sharing His guidance only with them. This could lead to questions about equality and why others were excluded.