Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
These verses state that God shows no partiality between nations, contradicting the notion of select nations like Ethiopia mentioned in Psalms 68:31.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Matthew 28:19
This verse calls for making disciples of all nations, which suggests inclusivity rather than focusing on nations mentioned in Psalms 68:31.
Matthew 28:19: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: [teach...: or, make disciples, or, Christians of all nations]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes that there is neither Jew nor Greek, contradicting any special regard for Ethiopia as implied in Psalms 68:31.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 10:12
Here, it is stated there is no difference between Jew and Greek, contrasting with specific national attention as in Psalms 68:31.
Romans 10:12: For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Paradox #1
Some interpretations of the verse historically suggested that it refers to the conversion of African nations to Christianity. This has led to debates given the diverse cultures and religious beliefs in Africa before the arrival of Christianity, and the potential imposition of religious interpretations by outsiders. This verse has sometimes been viewed as being used to justify colonialism and missionary activities, creating a conflict between historical African traditions and imposed religious changes.
Paradox #2
This verse might present a contradiction or inconsistency if interpreted in ways that conflict with ideas of equality or fairness. Different interpretations could arise over historical context, cultural aspects, or implications about superiority or divine favoritism. However, interpretations can vary greatly, and some may see no conflict at all.