Contradiction with Luke 4:10-11
This passage describes how Satan uses Psalms 91, suggesting it implies a false sense of guaranteed safety in physically tempting God.
Luke 4:10-11: For it is written, He shall give his angels charge over thee, to keep thee:
Contradiction with Matthew 4:6
Echoes the misuse of Psalms 91 by implying it promotes recklessness by presuming God’s protection regardless of actions.
Matthew 4:6: And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in [their] hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.
Contradiction with James 1:13
Contradicts the idea that divine protection is always assured, stating God does not lead into temptation or protect from all harm.
James 1:13: Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: [evil: or, evils]
Contradiction with 2 Corinthians 12:9-10
Suggests strength in weakness rather than the assurance of protection, contrasting the triumphant dominance implied in Psalms 91:13.
2 Corinthians 12:9-10: And he said unto me, My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness. Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me.
Paradox #1
Psalms 91:13 suggests that a person can tread on dangerous animals like lions and snakes without being harmed. Scientifically, this is not consistent with our understanding of animal behavior and biology. Lions and snakes can be very dangerous if not approached cautiously, and humans are not naturally immune to their attacks or venom.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict could be that the verse suggests humans can exert domination over dangerous creatures without consequence. This might be seen as conflicting with the broader principle of respecting and caring for all living things in nature.