Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Revelation 12:11 speaks about overcoming by the blood of the Lamb and by the word of their testimony, implying a form of spiritual victory. Matthew 5:39 advises turning the other cheek, suggesting a passive response rather than overcoming.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with James 2:24
Revelation 12:11 highlights victory through faith-related elements like the blood of the Lamb, while James 2:24 stresses that a person is justified by works and not by faith only, which can contrast with relying solely on spiritual faith elements for victory.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Revelation 12:11 supports triumph over evil by spiritual means, whereas Romans 12:19 advises individuals to avoid personal vengeance, leaving room for God's wrath, implying not overcoming on one's own.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
Revelation 12:11 speaks of victory over adversaries through spiritual means, whereas Proverbs 20:22 advises not to repay evil, but wait for the Lord to save, implying patience over immediate overcoming.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Paradox #1
Revelation 12:11 talks about believers overcoming by the "blood of the Lamb" and the "word of their testimony." A potential doctrinal conflict might arise with the concept of salvation by faith alone, as emphasized in some Christian denominations. Some might argue that the emphasis on the "word of their testimony" suggests that actions or testimony contribute to salvation, which could be seen as conflicting with the belief that faith alone is sufficient for salvation.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in that verse could be seen in the balancing act between advocating for peace and the acceptance of martyrdom or suffering for one's beliefs. Some may perceive this as a contradiction, as it seems to simultaneously promote a peaceful existence while also uplifting self-sacrifice and conflict as a path to overcome evil. Others might argue about the idea of victory through suffering, which can be seen as conflicting with more straightforward notions of non-violence and reconciliation.