Contradictions and Paradoxes in Revelation 13:10

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Revelation 13:10 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Revelation 13:10. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to John, this verse means that if someone captures other people, they will also be captured, and if they hurt others, they will also be hurt. It teaches Christians to be patient and keep believing in God, because God will make things right.

Revelation 13:10: He that leadeth into captivity shall go into captivity: he that killeth with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints.

Contradiction with Matthew 5:39

Revelation 13:10 says those who lead into captivity will go into captivity, while Matthew 5:39 advises turning the other cheek, suggesting a non-retaliatory approach.

Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

Contradiction with Romans 12:19

Revelation 13:10 seems to imply justice or recompense, while Romans 12:19 instructs believers not to avenge themselves, leaving vengeance to God.

Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.

Contradiction with Matthew 26:52

Revelation 13:10 indicates a reciprocal justice, while Matthew 26:52 warns that those who take the sword will perish by it, discouraging reliance on violence for justice.

Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?

Contradiction with Luke 6:29

Revelation 13:10 prescribes a form of justice, while Luke 6:29 encourages giving in to wrongs done to oneself, suggesting forgiveness over retribution.

Luke 6:29: And unto him that smiteth thee on the [one] cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloke forbid not [to take thy] coat also.

Paradox #1

The verse could be seen as conflicting with teachings about forgiveness and turning the other cheek, as it speaks about people facing consequences. This seems at odds with messages of mercy and non-retaliation found elsewhere in the Bible.

Paradox #2

Revelation 13:10 might seem like it supports the idea of inevitable fate or destiny, which can contradict other biblical messages about free will and personal responsibility. Some people may find it inconsistent with the belief that individuals can change their ways and seek forgiveness, as it suggests a strict justice or retribution.

Paradox #3

The contradiction or conflict could be that the idea of inevitable punishment and captivity may seem at odds with concepts of forgiveness and redemption that are also present in biblical teachings. This verse could be seen to emphasize retribution, while other parts of the Bible focus on mercy.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.