Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advocates for turning the other cheek and not retaliating, contrasting with the vengeance depicted in Revelation 16:19.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Commands love for enemies, contrasting with the destruction and wrath upon Babylon in Revelation 16:19.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Advises against seeking personal vengeance, which contrasts with the divine retribution described in Revelation 16:19.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Highlights mercy triumphing over judgment, which contradicts the judgment and punishment in Revelation 16:19.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency that might be raised concerning Revelation 16:19 could relate to differing interpretations about God's judgment and mercy. Some people might see a conflict between the severity of the judgments described and the teachings about God's love and forgiveness found elsewhere in the Bible. This can create tension between understanding God as both just and merciful.
Paradox #2
The verse may describe dramatic events such as a city splitting into parts or islands disappearing. Scientifically, such events would require significant geological activity like massive earthquakes, which don't align with our understanding of how frequent and how severe such events occur naturally. This inconsistency lies in the scale and immediacy of the described events without scientific evidence for such instantaneous global geological transformations.
Paradox #3
The verse might be seen as morally contradictory because it talks about a city receiving punishment for its actions, which could be viewed as harsh or unforgiving. This might conflict with the idea of a loving and merciful God. Some might find it inconsistent with the themes of forgiveness and redemption found in other parts of the Bible.