Contradiction with Revelation 13:17
This verse discusses economic control by the beast, contrasting the singular reign of the woman in Revelation 17:18 by highlighting a different form of authority and power.
Revelation 13:17: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
Contradiction with Revelation 11:15
It describes the kingdoms of the world becoming the kingdoms of Christ, contradicting the depiction of a secular woman's reign in Revelation 17:18.
Revelation 11:15: And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become [the kingdoms] of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever.
Contradiction with Daniel 2:44
Prophesizes the establishment of God's everlasting kingdom, which stands in contrast to the temporal and earthly authority of the woman in Revelation 17:18.
Daniel 2:44: And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, [but] it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. [the days: Chaldee, their days] [the kingdom: Chaldee, the kingdom thereof]
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:2-4
Foretells a time of peace and divine rule, contradicting the temporal power of the city represented by the woman in Revelation 17:18.
Isaiah 2:2-4: And it shall come to pass in the last days, [that] the mountain of the LORD'S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. [established: or, prepared]
Contradiction with Matthew 6:10
Expresses the desire for God's kingdom to come on earth, opposing the imagery of the woman representing earthly dominion in Revelation 17:18.
Matthew 6:10: Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as [it is] in heaven.
Paradox #1
The main contradiction or conflict arises from the different interpretations of what "the woman" symbolizes in the context of historical and religious analysis. Some interpretations see her as representing specific cities, empires, or religious institutions. Disagreements about what she represents can lead to conflicts among scholars, historians, and religious groups, each arguing their perspective based on historical and theological grounds.