Contradiction with 1 John 4:1
This verse advises believers to test the spirits to see whether they are from God, which contradicts the notion of reverence or acceptance of 'Mystery, Babylon the Great' described as a mother of abominations.
1 John 4:1: Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:21
This verse describes Jerusalem as a once faithful city that has become a harlot, providing a contrasting view on dedication versus the depiction of Babylon as a harlot.
Isaiah 1:21: How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers.
Contradiction with Matthew 16:18
Jesus speaks of building His church and the gates of hell not prevailing against it, in contrast to the depiction of Babylon as a dominant, yet unfaithful entity.
Matthew 16:18: And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. [Peter: this name signifies a rock]
Paradox #1
Revelation 17:5 describes a symbolic figure that represents great corruption and opposition to God. Some might see a contradiction when comparing this portrayal of evil with the teachings about God's ultimate goodness and control over creation. Questions might arise about why such evil is allowed to exist or have such influence if God is all-powerful. However, these are typically addressed in theological discussions about free will, the nature of evil, and God's overarching plan for redemption.
Paradox #2
Revelation 17:5 refers to a symbolic figure called "Babylon the Great." The conflict or inconsistency here could be about identifying who or what "Babylon the Great" represents throughout history. Different interpretations have been offered, ranging from an ancient city to a symbol for corrupt political or religious systems. This diversity of interpretations can lead to disagreements among scholars, theologians, and different religious traditions.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be seen in the portrayal of a figure or entity that is labeled negatively, which might not align with some interpretations of justice or fairness. It challenges readers to question how judgment is applied and who gets to determine morality, possibly leading to inconsistent views on guilt or innocence.