Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
While Revelation 19:15 describes Jesus executing judgment and wrath, Matthew 5:44 commands believers to love their enemies and pray for those who persecute them, highlighting a message of love and forgiveness rather than wrath.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Luke 6:35
This verse encourages doing good to enemies and being merciful, which stands in contrast to the depiction of divine wrath and punishment in Revelation 19:15.
Luke 6:35: But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and [to] the evil.
Contradiction with John 3:17
This verse states that God sent His Son not to condemn the world, but to save it, contrasting with the portrayal of judgment and wrath in Revelation 19:15.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Paul advises believers to leave vengeance to God and to overcome evil with good, promoting peace over wrath, which contradicts the violent imagery of Revelation 19:15.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with James 2:13
This verse speaks of mercy triumphing over judgment, which stands in opposition to the severe judgment and wrath described in Revelation 19:15.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction with Revelation 19:15 involves the imagery of Jesus using violent force, which seems inconsistent with other biblical teachings about Jesus promoting peace, love, and forgiveness. This depiction of a powerful and wrathful figure contrasts with the more gentle and compassionate image of Jesus found in the Gospels. Some find it difficult to reconcile these differing portrayals of his character and actions.
Paradox #2
One possible inconsistency could be the depiction of Jesus as a figure bringing judgment and wrath, which may seem to contrast with other New Testament portrayals of Jesus as a figure of peace and love. This dual representation could appear contradictory to some readers.
Paradox #3
The imagery described could be seen as conflicting with scientific principles because it involves symbolic and supernatural elements, such as a sword coming from a mouth to strike down nations, which don't align with the natural laws of physics or biology. This is more of a metaphorical or symbolic expression rather than something scientifically plausible.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in Revelation 19:15 could be seen in the portrayal of both divine mercy and divine wrath. Some people might find it inconsistent to reconcile the image of a loving and forgiving deity with the depiction of a forceful and punitive judgment. This could raise questions about how justice and compassion are balanced.