Contradiction with Matthew 28:18
This verse states, "And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth." This confirms rather than contradicts the authority expressed in Revelation 19:16.
Matthew 28:18: And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Contradiction with John 18:36
Jesus says, "My kingdom is not of this world." This could be seen to contradict the worldly kingship in Revelation 19:16.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 6:15
Describes Jesus as "the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords," which aligns rather than contradicts with the depiction in Revelation 19:16.
1 Timothy 6:15: Which in his times he shall shew, [who is] the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;
Contradiction with Luke 4:5-7
Satan offers authority of earthly kingdoms to Jesus, suggesting a contrast with the divine authority in Revelation 19:16.
Luke 4:5-7: And the devil, taking him up into an high mountain, shewed unto him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.
Contradiction with Matthew 27:37
The inscription "This is Jesus the King of the Jews" on the cross, highlighting a limited view of kingship, contrasts with the expansive titles in Revelation 19:16.
Matthew 27:37: And set up over his head his accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Revelation 19:16 could be the concept of "King of Kings and Lord of Lords" being attributed to Jesus. Some could argue that this title conflicts with the belief in a monotheistic God by implying a hierarchical structure within the divine. However, most Christian theology resolves this by understanding the Trinity, where Jesus is both distinct and yet one with God.
Paradox #2
The contradiction might stem from the portrayal of a figure with titles of ultimate authority and power, which can conflict with the values of humility and servitude emphasized elsewhere in religious teachings. This can create tension between ideals of leadership and humility.