Contradiction with James 2:24
This verse emphasizes that a person is justified by works and not by faith only, while Revelation 20:15 focuses solely on being written in the book of life, implying faith.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Romans 3:28
This verse states that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law, contrasting with Revelation 20:15's emphasis on being in the book of life, which may imply deeds.
Romans 3:28: Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:21
This verse claims that not everyone who calls Jesus Lord will enter the kingdom of heaven, but those who do the will of the Father, suggesting actions/obedience, unlike Revelation 20:15's focus on the book of life.
Matthew 7:21: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:8-9
These verses emphasize salvation by grace through faith, not by works, but Revelation 20:15 mentions consequences based on inclusion in the book of life possibly implying judgment by deeds.
Ephesians 2:8-9: For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:
Contradiction with Matthew 25:41-46
These verses describe judgment based on feeding the hungry and helping those in need, which is about actions, whereas Revelation 20:15 focuses on the book of life.
Matthew 25:41-46: Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
Paradox #1
Revelation 20:15 is often associated with the concept of judgment and the final destiny of individuals. A potential theological conflict could arise when reconciling this final judgment with the idea of a loving and merciful God. Some may struggle to understand how eternal punishment aligns with God's nature as loving and forgiving, leading to debates about justice, grace, and free will. However, interpretations vary, and many find ways to resolve this apparent contradiction within their theological frameworks.
Paradox #2
Revelation 20:15 could be seen as conflicting with the idea of a loving and forgiving God since it deals with consequences for those not found in the book of life. Some may see this as inconsistent with the teachings of unconditional love and mercy elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency regarding this verse could involve debates about the concept of eternal judgment. Different Christian denominations have differing interpretations of who is ultimately judged and what criteria are used, leading to conflicts about salvation and the role of grace versus works. This has historically led to disagreements about doctrine and what is required for entry into heaven.
Paradox #4
The moral conflict in Revelation 20:15 could be seen as the idea of eternal punishment for those not found in the book of life, which may seem inconsistent with concepts of forgiveness and redemption often taught elsewhere in the Bible. This can raise questions about the balance between justice and mercy.