Contradiction with Matthew 7:14
This verse states that the path to life is narrow and only a few find it, contrasting the open invitation in Revelation 22:17.
Matthew 7:14: Because strait [is] the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. [Because: or, How]
Contradiction with Matthew 22:14
It suggests that many are called, but few are chosen, which conflicts with the open invitation in Revelation 22:17.
Matthew 22:14: Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle him in [his] talk.
Contradiction with John 6:44
This verse indicates that no one can come to Jesus unless drawn by the Father, contrasting the unrestricted invitation in Revelation 22:17.
John 6:44: No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
Contradiction with Romans 9:16
It emphasizes God's mercy and choice, not human will, which contradicts the open calling in Revelation 22:17.
Romans 9:16: So then [it is] not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.
Contradiction with Romans 11:7
This verse suggests that not all who seek find, unlike the open invitation to all in Revelation 22:17.
Romans 11:7: What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded [blinded: or, hardened]
Paradox #1
The verse encourages everyone to come and receive the gift of the water of life freely. Some people might see a contradiction in the concept of freely given salvation if they also interpret other parts of the Bible as requiring certain actions or behaviors for salvation. This could seem inconsistent to those who emphasize the necessity of works or conditions for salvation.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict might arise from the concept of "free will" versus "predestination." On one hand, the verse emphasizes the invitation to freely come and accept a gift, suggesting that individuals have the freedom to choose. On the other hand, there are interpretations within religious contexts that propose predestination, where outcomes are already determined by a higher power. Balancing these ideas can lead to a perceived inconsistency in understanding human choice and divine intervention.