Contradiction with Romans 2:28-29
Romans speaks of true Jewish identity based on the inward heart and spirit, rather than physical lineage or outward distinction, which may contradict the identification with a "synagogue of Satan" that implies a focus on physical lineage in Revelation 2:9.
Romans 2:28-29: For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Emphasizes equality and unity in Christ, regardless of ethnic or social background, in contrast to identifying groups with negative distinctions as in Revelation 2:9.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14-15
Highlights the breaking down of barriers between Jews and Gentiles, opposing the divisive label used in Revelation 2:9.
Ephesians 2:14-15: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Contradiction with 1 John 2:11
Discusses how hating others is equivalent to being in darkness, contradicting the negative judgmental tone of Revelation 2:9.
1 John 2:11: But he that hateth his brother is in darkness, and walketh in darkness, and knoweth not whither he goeth, because that darkness hath blinded his eyes.
Contradiction with James 2:1-4
Warns against showing partiality, which counters the singling out of a group in Revelation 2:9.
James 2:1-4: My brethren, have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of glory, with respect of persons.
Paradox #1
Revelation 2:9 might be seen as controversial or conflicting for some due to its reference to a "synagogue of Satan," which could be interpreted as being critical of certain Jewish groups. This wording has been historically misused to justify anti-Semitic views, which is in conflict with broader Christian teachings of love and acceptance.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict in that verse might stem from differing interpretations about the identity or actions of the groups described. Some see it as a critique, leading to debates about judging others and broader themes of prejudice or religious discrimination. This can create tension between messages of love versus judgment within scripture.