Contradiction with Matthew 11:29
Revelation 5:5 portrays Jesus as a powerful conqueror, while Matthew 11:29 emphasizes Jesus's gentle and humble nature.
Matthew 11:29: Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
Contradiction with Isaiah 53:2-3
Revelation 5:5 highlights Jesus's victory and strength, contrasting with Isaiah 53:2-3 where Jesus is depicted as despised and rejected.
Isaiah 53:2-3: For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, [there is] no beauty that we should desire him.
Contradiction with John 18:36
Revelation 5:5 presents a powerful ruler, while John 18:36 indicates that Jesus's kingdom is not of this world, suggesting a different kind of leadership.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:7-8
Revelation 5:5 depicts Jesus in his majesty and kingly authority, whereas Philippians 2:7-8 focuses on his humility and obedience unto death.
Philippians 2:7-8: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Contradiction with Zechariah 9:9
Revelation 5:5 shows triumph and ruling power and contrasts with Zechariah 9:9, which emphasizes Jesus's meekness and lowly demeanor as he rides on a donkey.
Zechariah 9:9: Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he [is] just, and having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass. [having...: or, saving himself]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Revelation 5:5 could be seen in the portrayal of Jesus as both a lion and a lamb, embodying characteristics of strength and power alongside gentleness and sacrifice. This duality might seem inconsistent because it combines two contrasting qualities in one figure, potentially making it challenging to reconcile the image of a conquering leader with that of a humble, sacrificial servant. However, many interpret this as a harmonious balance rather than a contradiction.