Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
This verse speaks of peacemakers being blessed, contradicting the idea of taking peace from the earth as described in Revelation 6:4.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
This verse describes nations turning swords into plowshares and not learning war, contrasting the occurrence of war in Revelation 6:4.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with James 3:18
This verse emphasizes peacemaking and peace, juxtaposing the conflict and lack of peace in Revelation 6:4.
James 3:18: And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
This verse urges living peaceably with all men, conflicting with the removal of peace in Revelation 6:4.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Contradiction with Zechariah 8:16
This verse encourages speaking the truth and executing the judgment of truth and peace, which contrasts with the chaos of Revelation 6:4.
Zechariah 8:16: These [are] the things that ye shall do; Speak ye every man the truth to his neighbour; execute the judgment of truth and peace in your gates: [execute...: Heb. judge truth, and the judgment of peace]
Paradox #1
The theological inconsistency in that verse might be seen in how it presents a conflict involving the divine allowance of war and violence. Some might question how a loving and peaceful God could permit or facilitate such destruction. This could be viewed as conflicting with other biblical teachings that promote peace and love.
Paradox #2
The verse describes the removal of peace and an increase in violence on Earth. There might be a perceived contradiction with biblical teachings that promote peace and non-violence. However, this is generally understood as part of the prophecy narrative rather than a directive for behavior. The verse is seen as describing future events rather than contradicting general teachings about peace.
Paradox #3
Revelation 6:4 talks about a rider on a red horse who is given power to take peace from the earth, leading to people killing each other. A possible contradiction or inconsistency could be the difference in understanding how this event fits into historical timelines or events. Some people see it as a future prophecy, while others interpret it as symbolic of past or ongoing conflicts. This can create differing views on how this event is supposed to be understood historically.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or inconsistency in Revelation 6:4 could involve the concept of a supernatural event where peace is removed from the earth, causing people to suddenly turn against each other. Science relies on natural explanations for phenomena and events, while the description in this verse involves a divine or supernatural intervention which cannot be measured, observed, or tested scientifically. This presents a conflict as the scientific method does not accommodate supernatural explanations. However, this is more a matter of belief versus empirical evidence rather than a direct contradiction.Therefore, the main inconsistency lies in the explanation of events through supernatural means, which falls outside the realm of scientific inquiry.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict in Revelation 6:4 could be seen in the idea of promoting peace versus allowing or causing conflict and violence. While many teachings in the Bible advocate for peace and loving one another, this verse describes a scenario where peace is taken away, leading to conflict. This could be seen as inconsistent with the overall message of love and harmony.