Contradiction with Matthew 26:53
This verse mentions Jesus saying He could call more than twelve legions of angels, implying a divine force that surpasses earthly armies, highlighting the insignificance of the human army described in Revelation 9:16.
Matthew 26:53: But how then shall the scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?
Contradiction with Psalm 33:16
This verse states that no king is saved by the multitude of a host, contradicting the emphasis on the large army in Revelation 9:16 as a source of significance or power.
Psalm 33:16: There is no king saved by the multitude of an host: a mighty man is not delivered by much strength.
Contradiction with Zechariah 4:6
This verse emphasizes that victory comes not by might nor by power, but by God's Spirit, contradicting the focus on a large army's power in Revelation 9:16.
Zechariah 4:6: Then he answered and spake unto me, saying, This [is] the word of the LORD unto Zerubbabel, saying, Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts. [might: or, army]
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 14:6
This verse suggests that the Lord can save by many or by few, highlighting that the size of the army in Revelation 9:16 is not what determines victory or success according to faith perspectives.
1 Samuel 14:6: And Jonathan said to the young man that bare his armour, Come, and let us go over unto the garrison of these uncircumcised: it may be that the LORD will work for us: for [there is] no restraint to the LORD to save by many or by few.
Contradiction with Isaiah 31:1
This verse warns against relying on large armies for deliverance rather than seeking help from the Lord, directly countering the implicit reliance on a massive military force in Revelation 9:16.
Isaiah 31:1: Woe to them that go down to Egypt for help; and stay on horses, and trust in chariots, because [they are] many; and in horsemen, because they are very strong; but they look not unto the Holy One of Israel, neither seek the LORD!
Paradox #1
Revelation 9:16 talks about a massive army, and some people find it hard to believe such a huge number of soldiers could exist historically or logistically. This can lead to debates about whether the number is symbolic or literal, causing inconsistency in interpretation.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in this context could arise if one finds the number mentioned to be exaggerated or inconsistent with historical or practical considerations, such as the logistical challenge of managing such a large number in an ancient setting. However, interpretations vary, and some see it as symbolic rather than literal.