Contradiction with Matthew 10:29-31
These verses suggest that not even a single sparrow falls to the ground outside of God's will and indicate God's care for all creatures, contradicting the notion of harm as described in Revelation 9:4.
Matthew 10:29-31: Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father. [farthing: it is in value halfpenny farthing in the original, as being the tenth part of the Roman penny]
Contradiction with Jeremiah 29:11
This verse speaks of plans for peace and not for harm, contrasting with the destructive intent found in Revelation 9:4.
Jeremiah 29:11: For I know the thoughts that I think toward you, saith the LORD, thoughts of peace, and not of evil, to give you an expected end. [expected...: Heb. end and expectation]
Contradiction with Psalm 121:7
This verse assures that the Lord will preserve and protect from all evil, which contradicts the allowance of harm to occur in Revelation 9:4.
Psalm 121:7: The LORD shall preserve thee from all evil: he shall preserve thy soul.
Contradiction with Isaiah 11:9
It speaks of a time when no harm or destruction will exist, contradicting the imagery of harm presented in Revelation 9:4.
Isaiah 11:9: They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of the LORD, as the waters cover the sea.
Contradiction with Romans 8:28
Indicates that all things work together for good to those who love God, conflicting with the harmful consequences mentioned in Revelation 9:4.
Romans 8:28: And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to [his] purpose.
Paradox #1
Revelation 9:4 might seem to contradict the idea of an all-loving God, as it describes a scenario involving harm and suffering reserved for specific people. This could be viewed as inconsistent with the belief that God protects and loves all His creation equally.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency could be related to the symbolic nature of the described events not aligning with historical records or interpretations. Some people might find it challenging to connect the symbolic imagery and specific historical events or figures, leading to different interpretations and debates among scholars and religious groups about what events the text may be referring to. However, interpretations vary widely, and any contradiction largely depends on the perspective of the interpreter.
Paradox #3
Revelation 9:4 presents a situation where harm is selectively permitted, sparing certain people. The contradiction here might be seen in the perceived unfairness or lack of mercy in allowing harm at all, especially if it seems arbitrary or unjust. This selectivity can be seen as conflicting with the idea of a just and loving deity who would ideally protect everyone from suffering.