Contradiction with Matthew 7:21
This verse suggests that not everyone who calls on the Lord's name will be saved, as it emphasizes doing the will of the Father as a requirement for entering the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 7:21: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Contradiction with James 2:24
This verse contradicts by highlighting that a person is justified by works and not by faith only, implying that calling on the Lord alone is insufficient.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:14
This verse states that narrow is the way that leads to life, and few find it, suggesting that calling on the Lord is not enough for salvation as it implies difficulty and a select adherence.
Matthew 7:14: Because strait [is] the gate, and narrow [is] the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. [Because: or, How]
Contradiction with Matthew 25:41-46
This passage implies that actions towards others, not just faith or calling upon the Lord, determine one's eternal destiny.
Matthew 25:41-46: Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
Paradox #1
Romans 10:13 might spark a theological debate because it emphasizes that calling on the name of the Lord leads to salvation. Some argue this could be seen as contradicting other biblical teachings that emphasize faith, works, or baptism as necessary for salvation. These differences can lead to discussions about the balance between faith and actions in Christian doctrine.
Paradox #2
Romans 10:13 might be seen as inconsistent with verses that emphasize the importance of faith and works. Some interpret it to mean that calling on God is enough for salvation, which might seem to conflict with other verses that suggest a combination of faith and actions is necessary to achieve salvation. However, interpretations vary, and many believe these ideas can coexist without contradiction.
Paradox #3
Some people might see a contradiction or inconsistency with this verse because it suggests that anyone can be saved, regardless of their background or actions, just by calling on a certain belief. This might conflict with other parts of the text that suggest more specific requirements or conditions for salvation. However, interpretations can vary widely, and some readers reconcile these ideas in different ways.
Paradox #4
One possible contradiction with the concept in this verse is the exclusivity of salvation, which hinges on calling on a specific divine name for help or saving. This might conflict with beliefs that emphasize access to salvation or divine assistance through diverse beliefs or traditions. People from different faiths might see this as contradictory to the idea of a loving and just divine being who is accessible to all, regardless of specific religious adherence.