Contradiction with Matthew 15:24
This verse indicates a specific mission to the lost sheep of Israel, suggesting exclusivity rather than the rejection mentioned in Romans 11:28.
Matthew 15:24: But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse emphasizes God's love for the whole world, suggesting inclusivity in contrast to the idea of Israel being enemies for the Gospel's sake.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse asserts equality in Christ, which can contradict the distinction made between Israel as beloved enemies.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Ephesians 2:14-16
This passage speaks of breaking down the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles, contrasting with the notion of Israel being distinct enemies in some respect.
Ephesians 2:14-16: For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition [between us];
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
Peter acknowledges God shows no partiality and accepts those who fear Him from every nation, suggesting a contradiction to the idea of considering Israel as enemies.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with Isaiah 49:5-6
These verses describe Israel as a light to the Gentiles, which can contrast with the idea of Israel as enemies for the sake of the Gospel.
Isaiah 49:5-6: And now, saith the LORD that formed me from the womb [to be] his servant, to bring Jacob again to him, Though Israel be not gathered, yet shall I be glorious in the eyes of the LORD, and my God shall be my strength. [Though...: or, That Israel may be gathered to him, and I may, etc]
Paradox #1
Romans 11:28 might seem to present a contradiction because it talks about the Jewish people being enemies for the sake of the gospel but also being loved because of the patriarchs. This can seem inconsistent, as it addresses both rejection and love towards the same group. The key is understanding the context: it reflects different aspects of God's relationship with the Jewish people and highlights the complexity of divine plans and purposes.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction or conflict could be about how this verse addresses the status of Jewish people in relation to God's promises and love. On one hand, it suggests that they are in conflict with the gospel, yet on the other, it acknowledges them as beloved because of their ancestors. This can seem inconsistent with other biblical teachings about faith and salvation, creating debates about the interpretation and the balance between gospel rejection and enduring covenant love.
Paradox #3
Romans 11:28 could be seen as having a contradiction or inconsistency because it discusses the simultaneous love and opposition from God towards the people it addresses. On one hand, they are viewed as enemies for the sake of others, but on the other hand, they are beloved because of their ancestors. This could be seen as conflicting messages about how God views and treats the same group of people.