Contradiction with Acts 5:29
This verse emphasizes obeying God rather than human authorities, contradicting the call for subjection to governing authorities in Romans 13:5.
Acts 5:29: Then Peter and the [other] apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.
Contradiction with Daniel 3:18
The refusal to obey King Nebuchadnezzar's decree by Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego shows disobedience to an earthly ruler for faithfulness to God, opposing Romans 13:5.
Daniel 3:18: But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will not serve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up.
Contradiction with Exodus 1:17
The Hebrew midwives disobeyed the Egyptian king's orders, fearing God instead of obeying earthly authority, contradicting Romans 13:5's notion of submission.
Exodus 1:17: But the midwives feared God, and did not as the king of Egypt commanded them, but saved the men children alive.
Contradiction with Matthew 10:28
This verse advises fearing God, who can destroy soul and body, over man, which may oppose the submission to human authorities emphasized in Romans 13:5.
Matthew 10:28: And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
Contradiction with Revelation 13:1-7
Describes authority given to the beast, which might suggest not all governing powers are divinely sanctioned or worthy of submission, contradicting Romans 13:5.
Revelation 13:1-7: And saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. [name: or, names]
Paradox #1
Some people find a contradiction between the message of obeying authorities in Romans 13:5 and historical instances where governments or rulers acted unjustly or contrary to moral principles. This raises questions about whether blind obedience is always the right choice, especially in cases where authorities might behave immorally or oppressively.
Paradox #2
Some people might point out a moral conflict in Romans 13:5 because it emphasizes the importance of obeying authorities. This can be seen as inconsistent or problematic when the authorities are unjust or unethical. The question arises: should one always obey the law, even if it leads to immoral outcomes? This can create tension between following laws and following one's moral convictions.