Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
This verse states that "God is love," suggesting a focus on love instead of wrath or anger.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with Psalm 86:5
This verse emphasizes God's willingness to forgive and mercy, contrasting with the concept of wrath against ungodliness.
Psalm 86:5: For thou, Lord, [art] good, and ready to forgive; and plenteous in mercy unto all them that call upon thee.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:45
This verse indicates God treats the just and unjust equally by making the sun rise and rain on both, contrasting with selective wrath.
Matthew 5:45: That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.
Contradiction with James 1:20
This verse implies that human wrath does not produce righteousness, contrasting with Romans highlighting divine wrath against unrighteousness.
James 1:20: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.
Contradiction with Exodus 34:6
This verse highlights God being "merciful and gracious, longsuffering," which contrasts with the depiction of His wrath.
Exodus 34:6: And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth,
Paradox #1
Romans 1:18 is often interpreted as describing God's wrath against ungodliness and unrighteousness. A potential contradiction could arise when comparing this idea with other biblical passages that emphasize God's love, mercy, and willingness to forgive all sins. For some, it might seem inconsistent to reconcile the idea of divine wrath with the notion of a benevolent and forgiving deity. This tension can lead to different interpretations and understandings within theological discussions.
Paradox #2
This verse mentions the idea of suppressing truth, which, if interpreted as suppressing scientific truths revealed by nature, might conflict with the scientific approach of exploring and understanding the world. If taken literally, it could be seen as suggesting that some people might intentionally ignore or deny scientific evidence, which contradicts the principle of objective inquiry in science. However, interpretations of this verse can vary widely, so not everyone might see a conflict here.
Paradox #3
Romans 1:18 discusses God's wrath against human wickedness and the suppression of truth. A potential moral conflict could arise if one considers the idea of an all-loving God being wrathful as contradictory. Some might question how God can be loving and just while also displaying anger. This can seem inconsistent with the idea of unconditional divine love.