Contradiction with James 2:24
This verse states that a person is justified by works and not by faith only, which contradicts Romans 3:20 that speaks of justification apart from the deeds of the law.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Galatians 2:16
This verse affirms that by the works of the law, no one will be justified, but contrasts by highlighting justification through faith in Christ, aligning but also challenging the strict "law" perspective in Romans 3:20.
Galatians 2:16: Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:21
Emphasizes the importance of doing the will of the Father for entering the kingdom of heaven, implying that works have a role, in contrast to Romans 3:20's focus on law and deeds not justifying.
Matthew 7:21: Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Paradox #1
There could be a perceived contradiction with other passages that suggest faith, and not adherence to the law, is what leads to righteousness. Some verses imply that following the law is unnecessary for salvation, which might conflict with views that emphasize strict adherence to moral laws. However, many theologians argue these interpretations complement each other when considering the broader context of faith and grace in the scripture.
Paradox #2
Romans 3:20 can be seen as potentially conflicting with the idea that following the law is necessary for righteousness. This verse suggests that no one can be justified or made right with God by following the law, which might seem to contradict other scriptures that emphasize the importance of obeying the law. However, this tension is often resolved by understanding that the verse emphasizes faith in Jesus as the means of justification rather than legalistic adherence to the law.
Paradox #3
Romans 3:20 talks about how following the law cannot justify people in the sight of God. The potential contradiction or conflict here could be with the idea that laws, especially moral laws, are meant to guide and improve human behavior. If following the law doesn't justify someone, it might seem inconsistent with the purpose of having laws to lead a righteous life. This might create confusion about the role of laws in achieving moral or spiritual goals.