Contradiction with Proverbs 12:22
This verse emphasizes that lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, contradicting the idea in Romans 3:7 that a lie might magnify God's truth.
Proverbs 12:22: Lying lips [are] abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly [are] his delight.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:16
This verse prohibits bearing false witness, which contrasts with the implication in Romans 3:7 that lying could be somehow justified.
Exodus 20:16: Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Contradiction with Ephesians 4:25
This verse instructs believers to put away lying and speak the truth, which opposes the concept in Romans 3:7 of using a lie to demonstrate God's truth.
Ephesians 4:25: Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.
Contradiction with Colossians 3:9
This verse advises against lying to one another, contradicting any positive outcome that could be suggested by Romans 3:7.
Colossians 3:9: Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds;
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:5
This verse warns that a false witness will not go unpunished, and he who speaks lies will not escape, in opposition to the idea presented in Romans 3:7.
Proverbs 19:5: A false witness shall not be unpunished, and [he that] speaketh lies shall not escape. [unpunished: Heb. held innocent]
Paradox #1
Some people see a contradiction in this verse because it seems to suggest that doing something wrong might be excused if it leads to something good. This can appear to go against the idea that lying or any other sin is always wrong, no matter the outcome. This raises questions about whether the ends can justify the means and may seem inconsistent with other teachings about honesty and integrity in the Bible.
Paradox #2
Romans 3:7 could be seen as problematic because it seems to suggest that doing something wrong could be justified if it leads to something good. This can seem to contradict the broader biblical teaching that doing wrong is never acceptable, even if it leads to positive outcomes. This raises questions about whether the ends justify the means, which is generally not supported in most of the Bible's moral teachings.
Paradox #3
Romans 3:7 could present a contradiction or conflict when it seems to suggest that doing wrong might bring about a good outcome, which clashes with other biblical teachings that emphasize the importance of always doing what is right. This raises questions about whether ends can justify the means.
Paradox #4
The possible contradiction in that verse could be the idea that doing something wrong might be justified if it leads to a good outcome, which conflicts with the broader teaching that wrong actions are not excused by their results.