Contradiction with James 2:24
This verse suggests that a person is justified by works and not by faith only, contrasting with Romans 4:13 which highlights the promise through the righteousness of faith.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:10
Emphasizes that those who rely on the law are under a curse, suggesting a reliance on law rather than faith, which contradicts Romans 4:13's emphasis on faith.
Galatians 3:10: For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Contradiction with James 2:21
States that Abraham was justified by works, presenting a contradiction to Romans 4:13 which credits faith as the means of justification.
James 2:21: Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?
Contradiction with Matthew 19:17
Jesus emphasizes keeping the commandments to enter into life, which contrasts with Romans 4:13's emphasis on faith apart from the law.
Matthew 19:17: And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Paradox #1
Romans 4:13 could be seen as potentially conflicting with other biblical passages that emphasize the importance of the law in achieving righteousness. If this verse suggests that the promise comes through faith and not the law, it might raise questions about the role of the law in relation to faith, especially when compared to passages that stress adherence to the law. This might create a tension between understanding salvation by faith versus salvation by following the law.