Contradiction with James 2:24
This verse states that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone, which contradicts the idea in Romans 4:14 that if inheritance is by law, then faith is made void.
James 2:24: Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:10
This verse explains that those who rely on the works of the law are under a curse, contrasting with the notion in Romans 4:14 that suggests inheritance through the law.
Galatians 3:10: For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:4
It states that seeking justification by the law results in being fallen from grace. This opposes Romans 4:14 which implies a potential relationship between law and inheritance.
Galatians 5:4: Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Paradox #1
Romans 4:14 could be seen as contradictory to the idea that following religious laws or rules is necessary to be right with God. This verse suggests that if being right with God depended on following the law, then faith would be pointless, and the promise of God would be useless. It can create tension between the idea of faith versus following religious rules for one's spiritual standing.
Paradox #2
Romans 4:14 could have a contradiction or inconsistency if it is interpreted to suggest that faith is unnecessary when following the law alone leads to inheritance. This might conflict with other teachings that emphasize faith as a crucial part of righteousness and spiritual inheritance. Such interpretations may appear inconsistent within broader biblical teachings that prioritize faith alongside or even above legalistic adherence.