Contradiction with Matthew 5:18
Romans 7:6 speaks of being delivered from the law, while Matthew 5:18 emphasizes the enduring nature of the law until all is accomplished.
Matthew 5:18: For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Romans 7:6 suggests serving in the newness of spirit beyond the law, yet Matthew 5:17 indicates Jesus did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:10
Romans 7:6 implies freedom from the law, whereas Galatians 3:10 warns of a curse for those who do not continue following the law.
Galatians 3:10: For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed [is] every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.
Contradiction with James 2:10
Romans 7:6 discusses living apart from the law, while James 2:10 states that failing in one part of the law makes one guilty of all, suggesting the law's continued relevance.
James 2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one [point], he is guilty of all.
Contradiction with Romans 3:31
Romans 7:6 implies annulment of the law, but Romans 3:31 emphasizes the establishment of the law through faith.
Romans 3:31: Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.
Paradox #1
Romans 7:6 might appear to contradict other parts of the Bible that emphasize the importance of following God's laws, such as passages that highlight the enduring value and requirements of the Law. Some might see a conflict between being released from the law and still upholding moral principles, which are often derived from those laws. Another potential inconsistency is the interpretation of what it means to serve in the "new way of the Spirit," as it can create confusion on how to balance spiritual guidance with scriptural commandments.
Paradox #2
Some people see a conflict between Romans 7:6 and the idea of following religious laws. The verse suggests that people are released from the old laws and should serve in a new way. This can seem inconsistent with parts of the Bible that emphasize following those old laws closely. This tension creates different interpretations about the role of religious laws for believers.
Paradox #3
Romans 7:6 might seem contradictory because it talks about being released from the law to serve in a new way, while other parts of the Bible emphasize following the law. This could be confusing because it suggests freedom from the law but also calls for living rightly, which might seem inconsistent.