Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:16
This verse states that each person shall be put to death for their own sin, suggesting individual responsibility rather than predetermined outcomes.
Deuteronomy 24:16: The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:20
This verse emphasizes that the soul who sins shall die, indicating personal accountability and contradicting predestination.
Ezekiel 18:20: The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Contradiction with John 3:16
This verse presents salvation as available to anyone who believes, contrasting with the idea of predetermined election.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
This verse indicates that God is patient, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance, conflicting with the concept of predestination.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
This verse states that God desires all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of the truth, which contradicts the idea of pre-selection before birth.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Paradox #1
The possible theological conflict in Romans 9:11 arises from its suggestion that God's choice or election is not based on human actions or merits but on His own purpose and will. This can be seen as conflicting with the idea of free will, where individuals have the ability to choose their actions and determine their own fate. It raises questions about human responsibility and the nature of divine justice if God's decisions are not influenced by human behavior.
Paradox #2
Romans 9:11 might appear to contradict the idea of free will because the verse emphasizes God's choice not based on human actions. This can seem inconsistent with passages that highlight personal responsibility and the importance of individual decisions in faith.
Paradox #3
Romans 9:11 might raise questions about fairness and free will. It suggests that God's choices and plans aren't based on people's actions or decisions. Some might see this as conflicting with the idea that people have the freedom to shape their own destinies or that fairness should be based on what people do. This can be puzzling for those who believe in personal responsibility and justice.