Contradiction with John 3:16
Emphasizes God's love for the entire world, suggesting no favoritism.
John 3:16: For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 2:4
Indicates that God desires all people to be saved, not singling out individuals.
1 Timothy 2:4: Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
States that God shows no partiality and accepts anyone who fears Him and works righteousness.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Contradiction with 2 Peter 3:9
Expresses that the Lord is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:32
Declares that God takes no pleasure in the death of anyone, implying a universal offer of grace.
Ezekiel 18:32: For I have no pleasure in the death of him that dieth, saith the Lord GOD: wherefore turn [yourselves], and live ye. [yourselves: or, others]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Affirms there is neither Jew nor Gentile, suggesting equality in God's love and promise.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
Asserts that God is love, highlighting a universal, unconditional form of love.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Paradox #1
Romans 9:13 can be seen as challenging for some because it suggests that God chooses to love some people and not others. This can seem to conflict with the idea that God loves everyone equally and desires everyone to be saved, as mentioned in other parts of the Bible. This raises questions about free will and God's fairness.
Paradox #2
The possible doctrinal conflict with Romans 9:13 is that it appears to contradict the idea of God loving all people equally. This verse might seem to suggest that God chooses to love some individuals while rejecting others, which raises questions about fairness and the nature of God's love. This may seem inconsistent with other parts of the Bible that emphasize God's impartiality and universal love.
Paradox #3
Romans 9:13 could be seen as controversial due to its reference to God's choice and favoritism, sparking debates on the fairness of divine selection. Some argue it contradicts the idea of universal love and justice.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Romans 9:13 could be the idea of divine favoritism or God's love being selective. The verse suggests God loves some people and rejects others before they have done anything good or bad. This might clash with concepts of fairness or equal love for all people.