Contradiction with John 1:14
Romans 9:5 refers to Christ as God over all, while John 1:14 describes Him as the Word made flesh, dwelling among us, emphasizing His humanity.
John 1:14: And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Contradiction with John 14:28
Romans 9:5 asserts Christ's divinity, while John 14:28 highlights His statement that the Father is greater than He, suggesting a distinction in their divine nature.
John 14:28: Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come [again] unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.
Contradiction with Mark 10:18
Romans 9:5 speaks of Christ as God, but in Mark 10:18, Jesus questions being called "good" and states, "none is good, save one, that is, God," suggesting a separation from God.
Mark 10:18: And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? [there is] none good but one, [that is], God.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 15:28
Romans 9:5 emphasizes Christ's divine nature, but 1 Corinthians 15:28 describes a time when the Son also will be subject to God, indicating a subservient role.
1 Corinthians 15:28: And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all.
Contradiction with Matthew 24:36
Romans 9:5 implies Christ's divine omniscience, yet Matthew 24:36 mentions that the Son does not know the day or hour, suggesting a limitation not attributed to God.
Matthew 24:36: But of that day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:6
Romans 9:5 indicates Christ's divinity, but Philippians 2:6 states He did not consider equality with God something to be used to His advantage, implying a distinction in status.
Philippians 2:6: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
Contradiction with Colossians 1:15
Romans 9:5 portrays Christ as God, whereas Colossians 1:15 refers to Him as the image of the invisible God, implying representation rather than identity.
Colossians 1:15: Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
Paradox #1
Romans 9:5 could lead to debate about the nature of Jesus' divinity. Some people might find tension between this verse and other biblical passages regarding whether or not Jesus is explicitly described as God, as interpretations about the original Greek text can vary. The debate centers around how to understand Jesus' identity in relation to God the Father.
Paradox #2
Some people see a contradiction or inconsistency in Romans 9:5 about the nature of Jesus. The verse acknowledges Christ's human ancestry but also refers to him in a way that suggests divinity. This can be puzzling to some because it seems to both emphasize his human lineage and imply his divine nature, which might appear inconsistent to those who do not see how both can coexist. This tension often arises in discussions about the Trinity and the dual nature of Christ as both human and divine.
Paradox #3
Historical contradictions or conflicts regarding Romans 9:5 often arise from debates about its interpretation, particularly concerning the identity of Christ and His divinity. Different translations and interpretations lead to disagreements about whether the verse explicitly states that Christ is God or if it distinguishes between God and Christ. This has been a point of theological contention throughout history, especially between various Christian denominations.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in Romans 9:5 could involve different interpretations regarding the nature of Jesus' divinity, as some argue whether this verse explicitly attributes divinity to Jesus or emphasizes his human ancestry. This can lead to differing theological perspectives.