Contradiction with Proverbs 16:9
This verse states that a person's heart plans their way, but the Lord directs their steps, contrasting the seemingly chance event in Ruth 2:3 that suggests coincidence rather than divinely directed action.
Proverbs 16:9: A man's heart deviseth his way: but the LORD directeth his steps.
Contradiction with Ecclesiastes 9:11
This verse indicates that events can be random and not subject to divine preordination, whereas Ruth 2:3 implies divine providence in Ruth's field choice.
Ecclesiastes 9:11: I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race [is] not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all.
Contradiction with Proverbs 19:21
This verse suggests that while there are many plans in a person's heart, it is the Lord's purpose that prevails, contrasting with the apparent randomness in Ruth's actions in Ruth 2:3.
Proverbs 19:21: [There are] many devices in a man's heart; nevertheless the counsel of the LORD, that shall stand.
Contradiction with Jeremiah 10:23
This emphasizes that it is not within man to direct his own steps, implying divine intervention in one's path, whereas Ruth 2:3 portrays Ruth's choice as chance.
Jeremiah 10:23: O LORD, I know that the way of man [is] not in himself: [it is] not in man that walketh to direct his steps.
Contradiction with Isaiah 55:8-9
This highlights that God's thoughts and ways are higher than ours, contrasting with Ruth 2:3, which implies her actions were merely coincidental rather than part of God's higher plan.
Isaiah 55:8-9: For my thoughts [are] not your thoughts, neither [are] your ways my ways, saith the LORD.