Contradiction with Proverbs 16:33
This verse suggests that outcomes are determined by divine intervention, whereas Ruth 3:12 implies a legal obligation or a predetermined human custom guiding the event.
Proverbs 16:33: The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof [is] of the LORD.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 16:7
This verse emphasizes that God looks at the heart, not outward appearances or social norms, contrasting Ruth 3:12's reliance on legal customs rather than personal character.
1 Samuel 16:7: But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for [the LORD seeth] not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart. [outward...: Heb. eyes]
Contradiction with Matthew 22:39
This verse promotes the command to "love thy neighbor as thyself," which could contradict the legalistic approach in Ruth 3:12 regarding responsibilities without direct mention of love or compassion.
Matthew 22:39: On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with James 2:13
This verse speaks of mercy triumphing over judgment, potentially conflicting with the structured and legalistic process indicated in Ruth 3:12, where mercy is not mentioned.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]