Contradictions and Paradoxes in Ruth 4:20

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Ruth 4:20 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Ruth 4:20. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the Book of Ruth, this verse is part of a family tree showing how different people are connected in a family, just like grandparents, parents, and children. It helps explain how important Jesus's family is and how people long ago are related to each other.

Ruth 4:20: And Amminadab begat Nahshon, and Nahshon begat Salmon, [Salmon: or, Salmah]

Contradiction with Matthew 1:16

Ruth 4:20 mentions Salmon in the genealogy leading to King David, whereas Matthew 1:16 includes both Jacob and Joseph in the genealogy leading to Jesus, reflecting potential differences in how genealogies are traced or remembered.

Matthew 1:16: And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

Contradiction with 1 Chronicles 2:11

While Ruth 4:20 lists Nahshon as the father of Salmon, 1 Chronicles 2:11 also mentions Ram as the father of Amminadab, which can create a sense of overlapping or differing genealogical accounts.

1 Chronicles 2:11: And Nahshon begat Salma, and Salma begat Boaz, [Salma: also called, Salmon]

Contradiction with Luke 3:32

Ruth 4:20 shows the lineage from Nahshon, while Luke 3:32 provides a different genealogy of Jesus from David, highlighting variations in biblical genealogies.

Luke 3:32: Which was [the son] of Jesse, which was [the son] of Obed, which was [the son] of Booz, which was [the son] of Salmon, which was [the son] of Naasson,

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 23:2-3

Ruth 4:20 contributes to the genealogy leading to David, but Deuteronomy 23:2-3 suggests that a Moabite (Ruth was a Moabitess) could not enter the assembly of the Lord, implying potential issues of legitimacy within the genealogy.

Deuteronomy 23:2-3: A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.

Contradiction with 1 Samuel 22:9-10

Ruth 4:20 is part of the positive narrative leading to King David, whereas 1 Samuel 22:9-10 involves the betrayal of David, showcasing contrasting portrayals of loyalty and heritage.

1 Samuel 22:9-10: Then answered Doeg the Edomite, which was set over the servants of Saul, and said, I saw the son of Jesse coming to Nob, to Ahimelech the son of Ahitub.

Paradox #1

There is a historical inconsistency regarding the genealogies in the Bible. In Ruth 4:20, there might be a difference in the number of generations mentioned compared to other genealogical lists, like those in 1 Chronicles or Matthew. These differences can lead to confusion about the exact lineage and the number of generations between key biblical figures.

← Ruth 4:19
Share
Ruth 4:21 →
Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.