Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
While Titus 1:11 suggests the need to silence and rebuke, Matthew 5:39 encourages turning the other cheek and suggests non-retaliation.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
Titus 1:11 implies passing judgment to silence deceivers, whereas Matthew 7:1 advises not to judge others.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with James 1:19-20
Titus 1:11 advocates for silencing others, while James 1:19-20 emphasizes being slow to speak and slow to anger.
James 1:19-20: Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:
Contradiction with Romans 12:18
Contrasts Titus 1:11's directive to silence with the call to live peaceably with all, if possible.
Romans 12:18: If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.
Contradiction with Proverbs 15:1
Titus 1:11 advocates strong action against deceitful talkers, but Proverbs 15:1 recommends a gentle answer to turn away wrath.
Proverbs 15:1: A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:15
Encourages giving answers to everyone with gentleness and respect, potentially contradicting Titus 1:11’s more forceful silencing approach.
1 Peter 3:15: But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts: and [be] ready always to [give] an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear: [fear: or, reverence]
Contradiction with 2 Timothy 2:24-25
Suggests correcting opponents with gentleness, which may contrast with the implication of forcefulness in Titus 1:11.
2 Timothy 2:24-25: And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all [men], apt to teach, patient, [patient: or, forbearing]
Paradox #1
The contradiction, inconsistency, or conflict could arise from how the instruction is applied regarding silencing others. While Titus 1:11 suggests stopping those who teach incorrectly, some might see a conflict with the emphasis on freedom of speech and diverse opinions in modern contexts or with other biblical teachings encouraging patience and gentle correction. However, interpretations vary widely, and contexts are essential for understanding.
Paradox #2
Titus 1:11 can be seen to reflect a moral conflict with the concept of freedom of speech or expression, as it discusses silencing certain people for their misleading teachings. This might seem inconsistent with valuing open dialogue and discussion.