Contradiction with Matthew 27:10
In Zechariah 11:13, the thirty pieces of silver are given to the potter in the house of the LORD, while in Matthew 27:10, the silver is used to buy the potter's field.
Matthew 27:10: And gave them for the potter's field, as the Lord appointed me.
Paradox #1
The inconsistency with Zechariah 11:13 often arises from its prophetic connection to the New Testament story of Judas Iscariot's betrayal of Jesus for thirty pieces of silver, followed by his return of the money and his subsequent death. Some scholars point out differences between the prophecy in Zechariah and how the events unfold in the Gospels, leading to debate about the directness and accuracy of the prophecy's fulfillment. Additionally, there's a discrepancy in how the money is handled in Zechariah versus the account in Matthew, which can lead to interpretative challenges.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency related to this verse might arise from its connection to themes of betrayal and the value of human life. The verse discusses the low monetary value placed on a significant betrayal. This raises questions about the moral implications of valuing people and actions in terms of money, and the ethical responsibilities tied to such valuations. Some may see it as conflicting with the broader themes of justice and worth found elsewhere in moral teachings.
Paradox #3
The issue involves a difference in how a payment is recounted. The amount given in the passage, thirty pieces of silver, might be interpreted differently or questioned in relation to other parts of texts. This can cause confusion or conflict when trying to align different interpretations or narratives that also mention specific payments or transactions.